Regulators are focusing their overhaul of financial markets in the wrong place and should be cracking down on the “wild, Wild West” foreign-exchange market, a former hedge fund manager and derivatives trader says.

Darren Jordan, who has been in finance for 26 years and who was formerly a derivatives trader for some of the world’s largest banks, told Business Insider that the FX market was still full of aggressive mis-selling.

Despite the raft of banking scandals involving this market, regulators are not doing enough to stop it.

“There is a lure for young people to come to the City and into finance and make a quick buck. But there’s a lot of aggressive selling going on and especially in the FX markets, which has always been a bit of a wild, Wild West market,” Jordan, who is now a relationship director at Vedanta Hedging.

“There is not one centralised hub to trade it and not a single place where trades can be monitored and regulated like a stock being traded on an exchange,” he said. “In FX, it’s all over-the-counter.”

When Business Insider asked Jordan whether he thought regulators were doing enough to make the market more transparent and more tightly regulated, he said: "It's a pie-in-the-sky idea."

FX markets, which has always been a bit of a wild, Wild West market.

"I have a friend that works in Singapore in the derivatives settlement area, and when you mention 'Dodd-Frank,' he gives a look of terror," he said. "The US is implementing these rules, killing the derivatives market."

"Ultimately it's making big banks not want to get involved anymore, but yet regulators are not looking at the FX side of it," Jordan added. "Those products, like fixed income, are centralised and coming under immense pressure."

The Dodd-Frank Act was implemented in the US in response to the financial crisis. It involves stress-testing, and lenders have shyed away from trades or assets deemed risky or too volatile, like derivatives, to pass these tests.

"Regulators are looking at the wrong area, and it's a depressing state of affairs," Jordan told Business Insider. "FX is off on its own and I guess just too big, too powerful [to regulate]. The volumes that go through daily, even though it is a bit lower than last year, is still mind-blowingly huge. And if you want to make a lot of money, all you need to do is grab a little bit of market share as the market is so large."

Crazy FX market movements

fxturnover1

Foto: sourceBank of International Settlements

The FX market trades $5.1 trillion (£3.8 trillion) a year, and most of this is done over-the-counter.

OTC is when a trade happens away from a formal and transparent platform like an exchange. The FX market itself is not regulated, but individuals involved in it have to be authorised by a regulator. It is for this reason that Jordan points out that FX markets are extremely volatile and major movements can happen.

"You just have to look at several big events to see how differently the FX market operates," Jordan said. "The Bank of Japan now owns a third of Japanese government debt. You can see how distorted the market is.

"Also remember when the Swiss National Bank (SNB) tells the market that there is a floor for the Swiss franc and then suddenly pulls it away? It destroyed the central bank's credibility as well as massively moving prices. It's rare for something like a stock to move like that."

At the same time, the FX market has been fraught with fixing scandals. Numerous other banks around the world, including UBS, Citi, and RBS, have been fined for FX market manipulation. Essentially traders were found to be colluding to fix prices for personal gain.

Most recently, Christopher Ashton, the former global head of the FX spot-trading business at Barclays, was fined $1.2 million in August for his role in the FX fixing syndicate nicknamed "The Cartel."

Other FX veterans have also voiced their concerns for lack of FX market regulation. David Mercer, the CEO of LMAX Exchange, which trades $10 billion (£7.5 billion) in currency a day, told Business Insider that global regulators were "hearing but not listening" to the currency market's calls about how to put a stop to foreign-exchange manipulation.